National Coalition for Dialogue & Deliberation's

The Learning Exchange

fostering knowledge-sharing in the dialogue & deliberation community

Skip to main content.

Democratic Theory and Political Science: A Pragmatic Method of Constructive Engagement new

Bibliographic Details:

Archon Fung. American Political Science Review Vol. 101, No. 3: 443-58. August, 2007.

Summary:

This article develops two conceptual tools to synthesize democratic theory and the empirical study of institutions. The first is a standard to assess conceptions of democracy called pragmatic equilibrium. A conception of democracy is in pragmatic equilibrium just in case the consequences of its institutional prescriptions realize its values well and better than any other feasible institutional arrangements across a wide range of problems and contexts. Pragmatic equilibrium is a kind of Rawlsian reflective equilibrium....

The second is a method of practical reasoning about the consequences of alternative institutional choices that brings conceptions of democracy closer to pragmatic equilibrium. These two ideas are then applied to four conceptions of democracy (minimal, aggregative, deliberative, and participatory) and to two governance problems (deciding rules of political structure and minority tyranny) to show how each conception can improve through reflection on the empirical consequences of various institutional arrangements.

About the Author

Archon Fung is an associate professor of public policy at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

E-mail: [email protected]

Suggest changes to this listing or additional resources for the Learning Exchange.

© 2003-2007 National Coalition for Dialogue & Deliberation.
Learn more about us or explore this site.

###