|
|
|
 |
 |
      
|
 |
|
What is the relationship between dialogue and deliberation? What is Dialogue??Dialogue means we sit and talk with each other, especially those with whom we may think we have the greatest differences. However, talking together all too often means debating, discussing with a view to convincing the other, arguing for our point of view, examining pro?s and con?s. In dialogue, the intention is not to advocate but to inquire; not to argue but to explore; not to convince but to discover.? ?Dialogue is about what we value and how we define it. It is about discovering what our true values are, about looking beyond the superficial and automatic answers to our questions. Dialogue is about expanding our capacity for attention, awareness and learning with and from each other. It is about exploring the frontiers of what it means to be human, in relationship to each other and our world.? ?A dialogue is a forum that draws participants from as many parts of the community as possible to exchange information face-to-face, share personal stories and experiences, honestly express perspectives, clarify viewpoints, and develop solutions to community concerns.? ?Dialogue derives from the Greek word, dialogos. Logos can be explained as ?meaning of the word? and dia means ?through.? ?Dialogue can be among any number of people, not just two. It is a stream of meaning flowing among and through us and between us, in the whole group, out of which may emerge some new form of understanding or shared meaning.? ?Dialogue is a process of genuine interaction through which human beings listen to each other deeply enough to be changed by what they learn. Each makes a serious effort to take others? concerns into her or his own picture, even when disagreement persists. No participant gives up her or his identity, but each recognizes enough of the other?s valid human claims that he or she will act differently toward the other.?
A Public Peace Process www.colorado.edu/conflict/peace/example/saun7270.htm ?The goal [of dialogue] is to deepen understanding and judgment, and to think about ways to make a difference on a community issue you care about. This can occur in a safe, focused discussion when people exchange views freely and consider a variety of views. The process ? democratic discussion among equals ? is as important as the content.? ?The purpose [of dialogue] is to explore alternate viewpoints, to foster respect and understanding, and to help gain greater skill both communicating and working more effectively across social and ethnic boundaries.? ?Dialogue is about bringing together many voices, many stories, many perspectives, many experiences with a goal to increase understanding about others and ourselves. It is a safe and honest facilitated discussion aimed at providing an opportunity to tell your story, listen to others and build understanding.? ?Dialogue is a foundational communication process leading directly to personal and organizational transformation. It assists in creating environments of high trust and openness, with reflective and generative capacities. One might think of dialogue as a revolutionary approach in the development of the following organizational disciplines: continuous learning, diversity, conflict exploration, decision making and problem solving, leadership, self-managing teams, organizational planning and alignment, and culture change.? ?When I thought about Dialogue in this larger sense, I had the image of the open central courtyard in an old fashioned, Latin American home?you could enter the central courtyard by going around and through any of the multiple arched entryways that surrounded this open, flower-filled space in the middle of the house?For me, Dialogue is like entering this central courtyard in the spacious home of our common human experience. There are many doorways to this central courtyard, just as there are many points of entry to the experience of Dialogue. Indigenous councils, salons, study circles, women?s circles, farm worker house meetings, wisdom circles, non-traditional diplomatic efforts and other conversational modalities from many cultures and historical periods had both contributed to and drawn from the generative space that we were calling Dialogue.? ?Dialogue is a process which enables people from all walks of life to talk deeply and personally about some of the major issues and realities that divide them. Dialogues are powerful, transformational experiences that often lead to both personal and collaborative action. Dialogue is often deliberative, involving the weighing of various options and the consideration of different viewpoints for the purpose of reaching agreement on action steps or policy decisions.? ?Most people don't know how to talk together as effectively as they need to. But we can learn to recognize the dynamics of conversations. We can create ?containers?: fields for deeper communication. We can anticipate breakdowns and recognize them as the natural result of brewing relationships. We can draw to the surface undiscussable dangerous issues without inciting people to anger, inviting them instead to talk about dangerous subjects from an atmosphere of mutual interest. Once we know how to do all these things, and more, we can lead people into a space where they are truly thinking together, and where that in turn leads to dramatic new levels of alignment and capability.? ? What is Deliberation (and Public Deliberation)?Deliberation is ?“the kind of reasoning and talking we do when a difficult decision has to be made, a great deal is at stake, and there are competing options or approaches we might take. It means to weigh possible actions carefully by examining what is most valuable to us.?” Kettering Foundation ?“[Public deliberation] is a public consideration about how problems are to be defined and understood, what the range of possible solutions might be, and who should have the responsibility for solving them.?” Nancy Roberts From ?“Public Deliberation: An Alternative Approach to Crafting Policy and Setting Direction?” in Public Administration Review, vol. 57, no. 2 (124-132). 1997. ?“Deliberation?…is a form of thought and reflection that can take place in any kind of conversation [including dialogue, debate and discussion].?” ?“Deliberation refers either to a particular sort of discussion?—one that involves the careful and serious weighing of reasons for and against some proposition?—or to an interior process by which an individual weighs reasons for and against courses of action.?” ?“[Deliberation] is the act of considering different points of view and coming to a reasoned decision that distinguishes deliberation from a generic group activity?…. Collective ?‘problem-solving?’ discussion is viewed as the critical element of deliberation, to allow individuals with different backgrounds, interests and values to listen, understand, potentially persuade and ultimately come to more reasoned, informed and public-spirited decisions.?” ?“Public deliberation is simply people coming together to talk about a community problem that is important to them. Participants deliberate with one another ?– eye-to-eye, face-to-face, exploring options, weighing others?’ views, considering the costs and consequences of public policy decisions.?” ?“Public deliberation is a means by which citizens make tough choices about basic purposes and directions for their communities and their country.?” David Mathews From Public Deliberation in America Kettering Foundation ?“[Public deliberation is] social learning about public problems and possibilities.?” Robert Reich From Public Management in a Democratic Society ? What is the relationship between dialogue and deliberation?A typical dictionary definition of dialogue might explain that dialogue is ?“a conversation between two or more people,?” or that it is ?“an exchange of ideas or opinions.?” A dictionary typically describes deliberation as ?“thoughtfulness in decision or action?” or ?“discussion and consideration of all sides of an issue.?” Someone who works with these processes of public talk might explain that dialogue is a process that allows people, usually in small groups, to share their perspectives and experiences with one another about difficult issues. Dialogue is not about judging, weighing or making decisions, but about understanding and learning. Dialogue dispels stereotypes, builds trust and enables people to be open to perspectives that are very different from their own. They might then explain that deliberation is a related process with a different emphasis. Deliberation promotes the use of critical reasoning and logical argument in decision-making. Instead of decision-making by power, coercion or hierarchy, deliberative decision-making emphasizes the examination of facts and arguments and the weighing of pros and cons of various options. According to political scientist Iris Marion Young, the ?“?… norms of deliberation are culturally specific and often operate as forms of power that silence or devalue the speech of some people,?” noting that predominant ?“norms of ?‘articulateness?’ ?… are culturally specific, and in actual speaking situations ?… exhibiting such speaking styles is a sign of social privilege.?” (From ?“Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.?” In Democracy and Difference. ed. Behabib, S. Princeton: Princeton University , 1996.) Preceding deliberation with dialogue ?– and retaining many of the principles of dialogue throughout the deliberation process ?– can help ensure that everyone is able to participate fully and safely. Establishing ground rules, emphasizing the importance of listening, utilizing trained facilitators, encouraging storytelling and reflection on personal experiences and perspectives are all dialogue techniques that can help ensure that everyone at the table has a real voice. Dialogue lays the ground for the vital work of deliberation. The trust, mutual understanding and relationships that are built during dialogue allow for participants to deliberate more effectively, and to make better decisions. Many questions still need to be answered, though. Are there certain circumstances in which dialogue is less necessary, or even inappropriate? If people have an equal understanding of an issue, and already have good, trusting relationships, is dialogue unnecessary? If the issue is not personally important to those involved, should they go right into deliberation? If a decision needs to be made immediately, can dialogue be passed up? How often does dialogue lead to deliberation? How effective is dialogue that leads to action without deliberation?? These are all questions that need to be explored further. |
      
|
|
Last Updated:? July 22, 2003. |
Dialogue and deliberation are dynamic processes which can be empathy-enhancing, relationship-changing, problem-solving, action-planning, organization-developing, community-building, conflict-resolving, skill developing, prejudice reducing, consciousness-raising, and more! The various models and methods that are used in our field often emphasize, strive for and obtain different outcomes.
